Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in the treatment of single upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 centimeters. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis that combines a review of medical records with an outcomes management database. A total of 163 patients who underwent MPCNL and 137 patients who had FURS were identified between January 2017 and December 2021. Demographic data, operation time, hospitalization time, stone-free rate, and complication rate were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative general data of sex, age, BMI, serum creatinine, time of stone existence, stone hardness, stone diameter, preoperative hydronephrosis, and preoperative infection of the MPCNL group have no statistically significant difference with that of the FURS group. All MPCNL or FURS operations in both groups were successfully completed without any instances of reoperation or conversion to another surgical procedure. Patients who underwent MPCNL had a considerably reduced operation time (49.6 vs. 72.4 min; P<0.001), but a higher duration of hospitalization (9.1 vs. 3.9 days; P<0.001) compared to those who underwent FURS. The stone-free rate in the MPCNL group was superior to that of the FURS group, with a percentage of 90.8% compared to 71.5% (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant disparity in the rate of complications between the two groups (13.5% vs. 15.3%; P = 0.741). CONCLUSION: Both MPCNL and FURS are viable and secure surgical choices for individuals with solitary upper ureteral calculi measuring 1 to 2 cm. The FURS procedure resulted in a shorter duration of hospitalization compared to MPCNL. However, it had a comparatively lower rate of successfully removing the stones and required a longer duration for the operation.There were no substantial disparities observed in the complication rate between the two groups.FURS is the preferable option for treating uncomplicated upper ureteral calculi, whereas MPCNL is the preferable option for treating complicated upper ureteral calculi.Prior to making treatment options, it is crucial to take into account the expertise of surgeons, the quality of the equipment, and the preferences of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No.

Is extracorporeal lithotripsy a first-line treatment for urinary stones today?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy (SWL) as a first-line treatment for renal and ureteral stones METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of all the patients treated with lithotripsy in a third level center between January 2014 and January 2021; characteristics of the patients, the stones, complications and results of SWL is recollected. Multivariate logistic regression of the factors associated with stone size reduction was performed. A statistical analysis of the factors associated with additional treatment after SWL and factors associated with complications is also executed. RESULTS: 1727 patients are included. Stone mean size was 9,5mm. 1540 (89.4%) patients presented reduction in stone size. In multivariate analysis, stone size (OR=1.13; p=0.00), ureteral location of the lithiasis (OR=1.15; p=0.052) and number of waves (p=0.002; OR=1.00) used in SWL are the factors associated with reduction of stone size. Additional treatment after lithotripsy was needed in 665 patients (38.5%). The factors associated with the need for retreatment were stone size (OR=1.131; p=0.000), number of waves (OR=1.000; p=0.000), energy (OR=1.005; p=0.000). 153 patients (8.8%) suffered complications after SWL. A statistically significant association was found between the size of the lithiasis (p=0.024, OR=1.054) and the previous urinary diversion (P=0.004, OR=0.571). CONCLUSION: Lithotripsy remains an effective treatment as the first line of therapy for reno-ureteral lithiasis with a low percentage of complications.

Risk factor analysis for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

This study aimed to explore the risk factors for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures to prevent their occurrence and improve surgical outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 356 patients who underwent lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones and upper ureteral stones from January 2015 to August 2022. Among them, 290 patients had complete clinical data. General clinical data, perioperative data, and stone characteristics were collected for each patient. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for infection and bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The postoperative infection rate after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 19.31%, and the postoperative bleeding rate was 12.07%. Independent risk factors for postoperative infection were multiple stones (P < .001), stone size (P < .001), and stone co-infection (P = .012). Independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding were multiple stones (P = .008) and stone size (P = .014). Multiple stones, stone size, and stone co-infection are independent risk factors for postoperative infection after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Multiple stones and stone size are independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding after lateral decubitus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis patients under 2 years of age.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present our extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcomes in urolithiasis patients under the age of two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure was performed with patients < 2 years of age sedated, under anesthesia using ketamine and Dormicum (midazolam), in the supine position. Fragmentation was evaluated by fluoroscopy after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 74 procedures were performed on 65 kidneys. One patient with bilateral stones had two sessions of ESWL on the right side; three sessions of ESWL were performed in one patient with a unilateral stone, and two sessions were performed in seven patients with unilateral stones. All other patients underwent one session of ESWL. As post-procedural complications, hematuria was observed in 14 patients (12 mild and 2 significant), and vomiting occurred in 1 patient. Ureterorenoscopy was performed in 5 patients, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 6 patients due to a failed procedure. CONCLUSION: As a result, ESWL treatment is effective and has advantages such as a short hospitalization time, good reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and a low rate of complications. Therefore, we recommend ESWL as the first-line treatment for renal and proximal ureteral stones in infants < 2 years of age.

OBIETIVO: En este estudio, presentamos nuestros resultados de ESWL en pacientes con urolitiasis menores de dos años. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El procedimiento se realizó con pacientes menores de dos años sedados, bajo anestesia con ketamina y Dormicum (midazolam), en posición supina. La fragmentación se evaluó mediante fluoroscopia después del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron total de 74 procedimientos en 65 riñones. Un paciente con cálculos bilaterales tuvo dos sesiones de ESWL en el lado derecho; se realizaron tres sesiones de LEOC en un paciente con litiasis unilateral y dos sesiones en siete pacientes con litiasis unilateral. Todos los demás pacientes se sometieron a una sesión de ESWL. Como complicaciones post-procedimiento se observó hematuria en 14 pacientes (12 leves y 2 significativas) y vómitos en 1 paciente. Se realizó URS en 5 pacientes y NLP en 6 pacientes debido a un procedimiento fallido. CONCLUSIONES: Como resultado, el tratamiento de la ESWL es efectivo y tiene ventajas como un tiempo de hospitalización corto, buena reproducibilidad, costo-efectividad y baja tasa de complicaciones. Por tanto, recomendamos la ESWL como tratamiento de primera línea para cálculos renales y ureterales proximales en bebés < 2 años de edad.

Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy is an effective and safe method for >15 mm impacted ureteral stones in elderly patients: single center 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy operation in elderly patients with large and impacted ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and July 2021, 66 elderly patients with impacted, > 15 mm upper and middle ureteral stones underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in our center. The data for all patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65 ± 5.43 years. The mean stone size was 20.2 ± 2.5 mm. The mean operation time was 93.6 ± 13.2 minutes. Among patients, 16 (24.2%) had history of unsuccessful shock wave lithotripsy and 12 (18.1%) patients had history of ureterorenoscopy. Stone-free rate was 95.4% in all patients. Modified Clavien grade 1 complications were seen in 18 patients (27.2%), but no significant perioperative and postoperative complications were observed. Urinary extravasation lasting 5, 7 and 9 days was observed in 5 patients (7.5%) who were treated conservatively. The mean hospital stay was 3.4 ± 1.52 days. The patients were asymptomatic at the 6th week post-op follow-up, and no stones were seen on direct X-ray and abdominal ultrasonography. Intravenous urography and non-contrast tomography (NCCT) taken 3 months later did not show any obstruction or stenosis in the ureter. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy can be considered as the first treatment option for elderly patients with impacted and large ureteral stones, thanks to its high success and acceptable complication rates.

Economic burden of complicated ureteral stent removal in patients with kidney stone disease in the USA.

Aim: To examine the medical costs of simple versus complicated ureteral stent removal. Materials & methods: We included adults with kidney stones undergoing simple or complicated cystoscopy-based stent removal (CBSR) post ureteroscopy from the 2014 to 2018 Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database. The medical costs of patients with complicated and simple CBSR were compared. Results: Among 16,682 patients, 2.8% had complicated CBSR. Medical costs for patients with complicated CBSR were higher than for simple CBSR ($2182 [USD] vs $1162; p < 0.0001). Increased stenting time, increased age, southern US geography and encrusted stent diagnoses were significantly associated with complicated CBSR. Conclusion: Complicated ureteral stent removal doubled the medical costs associated with CBSR. Ureteral stents with anti-encrustation qualities may reduce the need for complicated CBSR and associated costs.

Does prior failed shock-wave lithotripsy impact outcomes of ureterorenoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) after failed shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Salvage URS) with those undergoing URS without any history of SWL (Primary URS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched up to 10th January 2021 for studies comparing outcomes of salvage URS vs. primary URS. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for procedure success and complications. Operating time was summarized using mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Seven retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the success rates of URS between the salvage URS and primary URS groups (OR: 0.83 95% CI: 0.65, 1.06 I2=0% p=0.13). On subgroup analysis, the success rate was significantly reduced in the salvage URS group for renal stones (OR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.34, 0.91 I2=0% p=0.02) but with no difference for ureter stones OR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.67, 1.21 I2=0% p=0.49). Pooled analysis demonstrated a tendency of longer operating time in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group, albeit with a statistically non-significant difference (MD: 8.91 95% CI: -0.56, 18.38 I2=98% p=0.07). Meta-analysis indicated significantly increased complications in the salvage URS group as compared to the primary URS group (OR: 1.83 95% CI: 1.34, 2.49 I2=0% p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that patients undergoing salvage URS for renal stones have significantly lower success rates which is not the case for ureteral stones. There is a non-significant tendency of increased operating times for salvage URS. Complication rates are significantly higher for salvage URS as compared to primary URS. Future studies with propensity-score matching are required to strengthen current conclusions.

Diabetes Mellitus Might Not Be Associated with Any Stone Component in a Local District.

BACKGROUND: Type II diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for urinary stones, but the pathogenesis remains unclear. The aim of our study was to present the distribution of stone components between DM and no DM group from a local stone center in China and to help the prevention department in decision-making. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with upper urinary stones attending our hospital from January 2015 to September 2018. The patients with complete information were divided into 2 groups: type II DM group (DM group) and without DM group (no DM group). The distribution of stone components was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients were complicated with DM, whereas 1,894 (89%) were not. Significant difference was found in the distribution of hypertension and BMI (p = 0, p = 0, respectively). Distribution of sex, age, and stone components did not differ between the 2 groups. By the binary logistic analysis, increasing age and sex seemed to be the main risk factors influencing the stone components. Only the calcium stone seemed to be free of the -impact from age and sex. Occurrence of hypertension is a single risk factor for calcium stone from our analysis. Presence of diabetes and increasing BMI was not found to be significantly associated with the risk for any stone component. CONCLUSIONS: In a local district, DM might not be the main factor associated with an increased risk for uric acid stone formation or any stone component. We should also consider the local characteristics of the stone distribution.

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of upper urinary calculi in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) showed relatively high incidence of urinary stones. Enlarged kidneys occupied by cysts could make the stone-removal surgery relatively difficult. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPLU), flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the ADPKD patients with upper urinary stones. METHODS: In this study, 45 patients with ADPKD who underwent RPLU, FURL and PCNL procedures were evaluated. Demographic and serum parameters, stone features, outcomes and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: 45 patients were included in the present study, 13 received RPLU, 21 received FURL, and 11 received PCNL. There were no significant differences in demographic and serum parameters between the three groups. Stone-free rates of the three approaches are 100%, 85.7% and 90.9%, respectively. Patients who underwent FURL had shorter mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Compared to RPLU and PCNL, FURL resulted in fewer complications, but the difference is statistically non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: RPLU, FURL and PCNL are commonly used surgical methods to solve upper urinary calculi in ADPKD patients and could achieve satisfactory stone clearance. Among them, FURL showed a relative high safety and faster recovery.

Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Through an Incision of the Ureter as a Good Treatment Option for Large Ureteropelvic Impacted Stones in Transplanted Kidneys.

Urolithiasis is a rare complication after kidney transplant. Over the years, treatment of kidney stones has evolved radically, but a standard approach for transplanted kidneys has not yet been defined. Here, we present a 69-year-old male patient who received successful treatment of nephrolithiasis of the transplanted kidney. The patient, who had received a kidney from a deceased donor, was admitted to our department following a posttransplant Doppler ultrasonography showing severe hydronephrosis of the transplanted kidney associated with acute renal function decay. Computed tomography scan confirmed the hydronephrosis of the transplanted kidney, showing a large, impacted, ureteropelvic 3-cm-diameter stone and other concretions around the ureteral stent. The patient was then treated with retrograde intrarenal surgery during an open ureterotomy. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he showed good functional reprise and a rapid decrease of serum creatinine levels. Intraoperative retrograde intrarenal surgery could be a valid option for treatment of kidney stones of the transplanted kidney during open surgery of the ureter or during ureterovesical anastomosis.

Risk factors of calculi in upper urinary tract after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. / Factores de riesgo de formación cálculos en el tracto urinario superior tras cistectomía radical con derivación urinaria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to identify the risk factors of upper tract stone formation in patients with diversions after radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with diversion after RC were collected in our center from January 2005 to December 2013. Three different common diversions were included: Orthotopic neobladder (ON: 168 patients), Ileal Conduit (IC: 93 patients) or Ureterocutaneostomy (UC: 104 patients). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the independent predictors of stone formation in the upper tract. RESULTS: A total of 365 consecutive patients (316 males, 49 females) were included. At a median follow-up of 48 months (range 12-65 months), 36 patients (9.9%) developed upper tract stone. Among them, 26 (72.2%), 5 (13.9%) and 5 (13.9%) patients underwent ON, IC and UC, respectively. 25 patients had renal stone and 11 ureter stone. Minimally invasive operations (endoscopic laser lithotripsy via the anterograde or retrograde approach in 24 cases, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 9 cases and shock wave lithotripsy in 3 cases) were carried out successfully in all stone cases. On univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, urinary tract infection (UTI), anastomotic stenosis and types of diversions (P<.05) were positively associated with upper tract stone formation. CONCLUSIONS: The variable predictors of upper tract stone may contain diabetes mellitus, hypertension, UTI, anastomotic stenosis and types of diversion.

Smartphone-based stent tracking application for prevention of forgotten ureteral double-J stents: a prospective study

ABSTRACT Purpose: Retained or forgotten ureteral stents (FUS) have a potential to cause significant morbidity as well as medico-legal issues and increased cost. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of smartphone-based Ureteral Stent Tracker (UST) application and compare the results with basic appointment card system to prevent FUS, prospectively. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone treatment procedure with indwelling DJ stents were equally distributed into two groups. In group-1, patients were followed using UST application. In group-2, only appointment cards were given to the patients. Two groups were compared in terms of stent overdue times and complete lost to follow up rates. Results: Forty-four patients in group-1 and 43 patients in group-2 completed the study. Among patients, 22.7% in group-1 and 27.9% in group-2 did not return for the stent removal on the scheduled day. In group-1, these patients were identified using the UST and called for the stent removal on the same day. After 6 weeks of maximal waiting period, mean overdue times in group-1 and group-2 were 3.5 days and 20 days, respectively (p = 0.001). In group-2, 3 patients (6.9%) were lost to follow up, while in group-1, it was none (p = 0.001). Conclusions: We found that the patients who were followed by the smartphone-based UST application has less overdue times and lost to follow up cases compared to the basic appointment card system. The UST application easily follows patients with indwelling ureteral stents and can identify patients when overdue.

Smartphone-based stent tracking application for prevention of forgotten ureteral double-J stents: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Retained or forgotten ureteral stents (FUS) have a potential to cause significant morbidity as well as medico-legal issues and increased cost. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of smartphone-based Ureteral Stent Tracker (UST) application and compare the results with basic appointment card system to prevent FUS, prospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent ureteroscopic stone treatment procedure with indwelling DJ stents were equally distributed into two groups. In group-1, patients were followed using UST application. In group-2, only appointment cards were given to the patients. Two groups were compared in terms of stent overdue times and complete lost to follow up rates. RESULTS: Forty-four patients in group-1 and 43 patients in group-2 completed the study. Among patients, 22.7% in group-1 and 27.9% in group-2 did not return for the stent removal on the scheduled day. In group-1, these patients were identified using the UST and called for the stent removal on the same day. After 6 weeks of maximal waiting period, mean overdue times in group-1 and group-2 were 3.5 days and 20 days, respectively (p = 0.001) . In group-2, 3 patients (6.9%) were lost to follow up, while in group-1, it was none (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the patients who were followed by the smartphone-based UST application has less overdue times and lost to follow up cases compared to the basic appointment card system. The UST application easily follows patients with indwelling ureteral stents and can identify patients when overdue.

Treatment of urinary calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The development of ureteral calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction has not been reported. This study was performed to explore the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopy combined with laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ipsilateral lower ureteral calculi and lower calyceal calculi after Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction. CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with ipsilateral distal ureteral calculi and ipsilateral lower calyceal calculi. One year prior to this admission, the patient had undergone Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction due to long-segment ureteral stenosis. After conservative treatment failed, we used a rigid ureteroscope with a holmium laser to break up the distal ureteral calculi, and successfully removed the renal calculi with a digital flexible ureteroscope and basket extractor. CONCLUSION: The successful outcome of the present case suggests that ureteroscopy combined with laser lithotripsy is a valuable option for the management of urinary calculi following Yang-Monti ileal ureter reconstruction.

Pelvic lipomatosis with ureteral calculi managed by flexible ureteroscopy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Pelvic lipomatosis (PL) is a benign disease characterized by overgrowth of adipose tissue in pelvic space. Hydronephrosis and ureterectasis are common complications caused by PL in urinary system. But PL accompanied with upper urinary tract calculi is rare. Also there has been no report of PL with ureteral calculi managed by flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). PATIENT CONCERNS: A 62-year-old man who has been diagnosed of PL was found to have a right-side ureteral calculi by ultrasound in the routine health examination. In addition, the patient has a history of open surgery of uretero-vesical reimplantation in the left side 13 years ago because of heavy hydronephrosis in the left side. DIAGNOSES: The diagnosis was PL with ureteral calculi in the right side and heavy hydronephrosis in the left side. INTERVENTIONS: FURS was performed to remove the right ureteral calculi. OUTCOMES: A follow-up of 1 year showed that there was no progression of the hydronephrosis in right side and serum creatinine was stable. LESSONS: FURS is a suitable option for the upper urinary tract calculi accompanied with anatomical abnormality such as horseshoe kidney, pelvic ectopic kidney and so on. For patient of PL accompanied with upper urinary tract calculi, fURS is suitable and indicated.

Ureterolithotripsy for a Ureteral Calculus at the Ureteroureterostomy of a Renal-transplant Recipient.

We describe a 40-year-old living-donor renal-transplant recipient who underwent successful ureterolithotripsy. He had been on hemodialysis for >15 years pre-transplant and underwent ureteroureterostomy along with the surgery. One year post-transplant, ultrasound examination demonstrated hydronephrosis, and CT showed a 6-mm ureteral calculus at the ureteroureterostomy site. No pain and no elevated serum creatinine were present. As the ureter was easily accessed, we performed a ureterolithotripsy, which would confirm whether a suture caused the calculus. Despite ureteral tortuosity, laser stone fragmentation succeeded. The calculus was completely removed with an antegrade guidewire. Mild postoperative ureteral stenosis resolved with a temporary ureteral stent without balloon dilation. Ureterolithotripsy is effective even in renal transplant recipients with ureteroureterostomy.

Epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in seven countries of South-Eastern Europe: S.E.G.U.R. 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate some epidemiological aspects of kidney stones in the South- Eastern European area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2015 to December 2015, 538 consecutive patients were treated and evaluated for reno-ureteral stones in eight departments in Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, FYR Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. RESULTS: The age of onset was lower in Turkey and higher in Italy. The rate of recurrent patients was higher in Romania and Serbia, while first renal stone formers were more frequent in Italy. The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. In Bulgaria, Greece and Romania larger calculi from recurrent patients were more frequent. In Italy and Turkey smaller calculi from first renal stone formers were more frequent. CONCLUSIONS: The previous history of kidney stones, the characteristics of the stones and the dietary habits of the patients were different in different countries. A common dietary pattern associated with the formation of kidney stones was not observed, but each country showed different risk factors.